PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2012New England Journal of Medicine2,361 citationsOpen Access

Oral Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism

View Full Paper

Structured PICO

Does rivaroxaban prevent symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism compared to standard therapy?

P
Population
4,832 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without deep-vein thrombosis
I
Intervention
Rivaroxaban 15 mg oral twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily
C
Comparator
Standard therapy with enoxaparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for 3, 6, or 12 months
O
Outcome
Symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolismhard clinical

A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban is noninferior to standard enoxaparin/VKA therapy for treating acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism, with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been shown to be as effective as standard anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis, without the need for laboratory monitoring. This approach may also simplify the treatment of pulmonary embolism. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, event-driven, noninferiority trial involving 4832 patients who had acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without deep-vein thrombosis, we compared rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with standard therapy with enoxaparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for 3, 6, or 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban was noninferior to standard therapy (noninferiority margin, 2.0; P=0.003) for the primary efficacy outcome, with 50 events in the rivaroxaban group (2.1%) versus 44 events in the standard-therapy group (1.8%) (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.75 to 1.68). The principal safety outcome occurred in 10.3% of patients in the rivaroxaban group and 11.4% of those in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P=0.23). Major bleeding was observed in 26 patients (1.1%) in the rivaroxaban group and 52 patients (2.2%) in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.79; P=0.003). Rates of other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban alone was noninferior to standard therapy for the initial and long-term treatment of pulmonary embolism and had a potentially improved benefit-risk profile. (Funded by Bayer HealthCare and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; EINSTEIN-PE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00439777.).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2012 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cc743f40403d04c3f75aahttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1113572
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism2010 · 3,268 citations
  2. 2Oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and PE randomized studies2013 · 555 citations
  3. 3Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Real-World Study2020 · 7 citations
  4. 4EFFICACY AND SAFETY OUTCOMES OF RIVAROXABAN IN ACUTE DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS PATIENTS2015
  5. 5Rivaroxaban in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism and the Prevention of Recurrences2014 · 10 citations