PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1981Hypertension36 citationsOpen Access

Converting enzyme inhibition during chronic angiotensin II infusion in rats. Evidence against a nonangiotensin mechanism.

View Full Paper
STStephen C. TextorHBH. R. BrunnerHGHaralambos Gavras

Key Points

  • To determine whether chronic converting enzyme inhibition exerts antihypertensive or metabolic actions through non-angiotensin mechanisms, such as bradykinin accumulation, during continuous angiotensin II infusion.
  • Infused rats chronically with angiotensin II at 30 ng/min to maintain constant circulating levels.
  • Treated rats with either oral captopril (converting enzyme inhibition) or dextrose control for up to 9 days, measuring enzyme activity, bradykinin sensitivity, hemodynamics, and metabolic balance.
  • Angiotensin II infusion increased mean blood pressure by an average of 22 mm Hg across animals.
  • Captopril produced effective converting enzyme blockade, evidenced by a 10-fold increase in vasodepressor sensitivity to exogenous bradykinin and markedly decreased plasma converting enzyme activity.
  • On day 9, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, saralasin-induced blood pressure reduction, and sodium and potassium metabolism did not differ between captopril- and dextrose-treated groups.

Abstract

Interpretation of results obtained with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in hypertensive patients has been obscured by the possibility of nonangiotensin-mediated mechanisms, particularly rats, we have compared the effects of converting enzyme inhibition (CEI) by oral captopril administration to those of dextrose. In this setting of constant angiotensin II levels, any apparent effects of CEI must be mediated by a nonangiotensin-related mechanism. Angiotensin II infusion at 30 ng/min increased mean blood pressure by an average of 22 mm Hg. Following 7 days of CEI, effective blockade of converting enzyme was established both by a 10-fold elevation of vasodepressor sensitivity to exogenous bradykinin and a markedly decreased plasma converting enzyme activity. On the ninth day of angiotensin II infusion, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and plasma renin activity were not different between CEI and dextrose-treated groups. Similarly, blockade of angiotensin II by saralasin induced a comparable fall in blood pressure in both groups. Metabolic studies also revealed no long-term differences in water and food intake, weight change, or sodium and potassium metabolisms. These findings suggest that, in the continued presence of angiotensin II, there is no detectable hemodynamic or metabolic effect of chronic converting enzyme inhibition, and therefore that bradykinin plays little or no role in its long-term antihypertensive action.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Textor et al. (1981) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d4ee0d3686d25b46e557bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.3.2.269
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The role of tissue renin-angiotensin systems in hypertension and effects of chronic converting-enzyme inhibition1990 · 21 citations
  2. 2The opposing effects of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme blockade by captopril on the responses to exogenous angiotensin II and vasopressin vs. norepinephrine in rats.1981 · 38 citations
  3. 3Blood pressure control by the renin-angiotensin system in normotensive subjects. Assessment by angiotensin converting enzyme and renin inhibition.1992 · 138 citations
  4. 4Plasma angiotensins and blood pressure during converting enzyme inhibition.1987 · 117 citations
  5. 5Comparison of the Acute Hypotensive Effects of Renin Inhibition, Converting Enzyme Inhibition, and Angiotensin II Antagonism in Rats1990 · 34 citations