PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 20, 2014Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology302 citationsOpen Access

Five-Year Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Termination of Atrial Fibrillation as a Procedural Endpoint

View Full Paper
PKPaul KhairyElectrophysiologySMShinsuke MiyazakiElectrophysiologyVAValérie Aurillac-LavignolleCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux

Structured PICO

Does a stepwise catheter ablation strategy aiming for AF termination prevent arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
150 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), mean age 57±10 years.
I
Intervention
Catheter ablation using a stepwise approach (pulmonary vein isolation, electrogram-guided, and linear ablation) aiming for AF termination as a procedural endpoint, with repeat ablation for recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia.
O
Outcome
Arrhythmia-free survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years

A stepwise catheter ablation strategy aiming for AF termination in persistent AF yields a 62.9% arrhythmia-free survival rate at 5 years, typically requiring multiple procedures.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine 5-year efficacy of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using AF termination as a procedural end point. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients (57±10 years) underwent persistent AF ablation using a stepwise ablation approach (pulmonary vein isolation, electrogram-guided, and linear ablation) with the desired procedural end point being AF termination. Repeat ablation was performed for recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia. AF was terminated by ablation in 120 patients (80%). Arrhythmia-free survival rates after a single procedure were 35.3%±3.9%, 28.0%±3.7%, and 16.8%±3.2% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Arrhythmia-free survival rates after the last procedure (mean 2.1±1.0 procedures) were 89.7%±2.5%, 79.8%±3.4%, and 62.9%±4.5%, at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. During a median follow-up of 58 (interquartile range, 43-73) months after the last ablation procedure, 97 of 150 (64.7%) patients remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs. Another 14 (9.3%) patients maintained sinus rhythm after reinitiation of antiarrhythmic drugs, and an additional 15 (10.0%) patients regressed to paroxysmal recurrences only. Failure to terminate AF during the index procedure (hazard ratio 3.831; 95% confidence interval, 2.070-7.143; P<0.001), left atrial diameter≥50 mm (hazard ratio 2.083; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-4.016; P=0.03), continuous AF duration≥18 months (hazard ratio 1.984; 95% confidence interval, 1.024-3.846; P<0.04), and structural heart disease (hazard ratio 1.874; 95% confidence interval, 1.037-3.388; P=0.04) predicted arrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, an ablation strategy aiming at AF termination is associated with freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in the majority of patients over a 5-year follow-up period. Procedural AF nontermination and specific baseline factors predict long-term outcome after ablation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khairy et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7e7f000652253f66c2f906https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.114.001943
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper