PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1999Journal of Hypertension84 citationsOpen Access

Impact of arterial elastance as a measure of vascular load on left ventricular geometry in hypertension

PSPier Sergio SabaAGAntonello GanauRDRichard B. Devereux

Structured PICO

P
Population
81 normotensive and 174 untreated hypertensive individuals (total n=255) enrolled in a referral hypertension centre.
C
Comparator
Normotensive individuals, and hypertensives with normal effective arterial elastance index (EaI)
O
Outcome
Relationship of effective arterial elastance (Ea) with left ventricular anatomy and function (LVMI, RWT, SV, FSe, FSm, TPR)surrogate

High arterial elastance index identifies a subset of hypertensive patients characterized by concentric left ventricular remodeling, increased peripheral resistance, and depressed systolic function.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Effective arterial elastance (Ea), integrating the pulsatile component of left ventricular (LV) afterload, is an estimate of aortic input impedance. We evaluated relationships of Ea with left ventricular anatomy and function in essential hypertension. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis in 81 normotensive and 174 untreated hypertensive individuals enrolled in a referral hypertension centre. METHODS: Using echocardiography we determined left ventricular mass index (LVMI), relative wall thickness (RWT), stroke volume (SV), endocardial (FSe) and midwall (FSm) fractional shortening and total peripheral resistance (TPR). Carotid pressure waveforms were obtained by arterial tonometry, and end-systolic pressure (Pes) was measured at the dicrotic notch. Ea index (EaI) was calculated as Pes/(SV index); LV elastance (Ees) was estimated as Pes/LV end-systolic volume, and ventriculo-arterial coupling was evaluated by the Ea/Ees ratio. RESULTS: EaI was higher in hypertensives than in normotensives (3.02 +/- 0.63 versus 2.40 +/- 0.52 mmHg/l per m2; P< 0.0001). Using the 95% upper confidence limit in normotensives, hypertensives were divided in two groups with normal or elevated EaI. The 38 hypertensives with elevated EaI had higher RWT (0.41 +/- 0.06 versus 0.37 +/- 0.05), lower LVMI (87.5 +/- 18.5 versus 96.8 +/- 19.3 g/m2), higher TPR (2247 +/- 408 versus 1658 +/- 371 dynes/cm s(-5)) and lower FSe and FSm (35 +/- 5 versus 39 +/- 5 and 16 +/- 2 versus 18 +/- 2%; all P< 0.05) than patients with normal EaI. Ea/Ees ratio was increased and cardiac output was reduced in hypertensives with elevated EaI. CONCLUSIONS: High values of EaI identify a minority of hypertensive patients characterized by elevated TPR, left ventricular concentric remodelling, depressed left ventricular systolic function and impaired ventriculo-arterial coupling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saba et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f347e7caf4fb4be694a32https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199917070-00018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effective arterial elastance as index of arterial vascular load in humans.1992 · 834 citations
  2. 2Contribution of systemic vascular resistance and total arterial compliance to effective arterial elastance in humans2003 · 148 citations
  3. 3Assessing Left Ventricular Performance2007 · 3 citations
  4. 4Analytical Expression of Effective Afterload in Aortic and Mitral Regurgitation.1999 · 7 citations
  5. 5Relationship between impaired elastic properties of aorta with left ventricle geometric patterns and left ventricle diastolic functions in patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension2006 · 17 citations