Peripheral resistance contributes approximately three times more to effective arterial elastance than arterial stiffness, and different combinations of resistance and compliance can yield the same Ea but significantly different stroke work and maximal power.
Effective arterial elastance (E(a)), defined as the ratio of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic pressure and stroke volume, lumps the steady and pulsatile components of the arterial load in a concise way. Combined with E(max), the slope of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relation, E(a)/E(max) has been used to assess heart-arterial coupling. A mathematical heart-arterial interaction model was used to study the effects of changes in peripheral resistance (R; 0.6-1.8 mmHg x ml(-1) x s) and total arterial compliance (C; 0.5-2.0 ml/mmHg) covering the human pathophysiological range. E(a), E(a)/E(max,) LV stroke work, and hydraulic power were calculated for all conditions. Multiple-linear regression analysis revealed a linear relation between E(a), R/T (where T is cycle length), and 1/C: E(a) = -0.13 + 1.02R/T + 0.31/C, indicating that R/T contributes about three times more to E(a) than arterial stiffness (1/C). It is demonstrated that different pathophysiological combinations of R and C may lead to the same E(a) and E(a)/E(max) but can result in differences of 10% in stroke work and 50% in maximal power.
Segers et al. (2002) studied this question.