PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2001Stroke114 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of Carotid Arterial Resistive Indices With Intima-Media Thickness as Sonographic Markers of Atherosclerosis

View Full Paper
BFBeat FrauchigerHSHans Peter SchmidCRChristian Roedel

Structured PICO

Does carotid arterial resistive index (RI) correlate with atherosclerosis risk scores as well as intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with vascular risk factors?

P
Population
157 patients (94 men and 63 women; mean age 63 [range 19 to 80] years) with at least 1 vascular risk factor or a known vascular disease.
I
Intervention
Duplex sonography of the common carotid (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) with determination of resistive index (RI)
C
Comparator
Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery
O
Outcome
Correlation with the SMART atherosclerosis risk score and ability to distinguish between low-risk and high-risk patientssurrogate

Carotid internal artery resistive index (RI) is comparable to intima-media thickness (IMT) in correlating with atherosclerosis risk scores and distinguishing high-risk patients.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Background and Purpose-The intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery is a (morphological) sonographic parameter that depends on the degree of atherosclerosis. In the renal arteries, the value of the (hemodynamic) resistive index (RI) is correlated with the severity of atherosclerosis. In contrast to the well-known IMT, no study has yet applied the carotid RI to estimate generalized atherosclerosis. METHODS: -The SMART atherosclerosis risk score was determined in 157 patients (94 men and 63 women; mean age 63 range 19 to 80 years) with at least 1 vascular risk factor or a known vascular disease. Duplex sonography of the common carotid (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) was then performed, with determination of IMT and RI. RESULTS: -The mean risk score of all patients was 8.8+/-3.5 (range 1 to 17), the mean IMT value in the CCA was 0.727+/-0.161 mm, the mean RI in CCA was 0.79+/-0.066, and the mean RI in ICA was 0.661+/-0.082. Highly significant correlations were found between the score and IMT CCA and the score and RI ICA (r=0.62, P:<0.0001 and r=0.55, P:<0.0001). The score-RI CCA correlation was much less marked (r=0.354, P:<0.0001). The intraobserver and interobserver agreement was less for IMT than for RI CCA and ICA. The areas under the curve of the receiver operating curves to distinguish between low-risk and high-risk patients resulted in values of 0.86, 0.81, and 0.69 for IMT, RI ICA, and RI CCA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: -Although RI reflects the atherosclerotic process in an indirect manner, the correlation between the RI ICA and the SMART atherosclerosis score as well as the ability to distinguish between low- and high-risk patients are comparable to those of the well-known IMT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Frauchiger et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83a5f3e860903c4d4d7a6bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.4.836
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper