PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2003Heart154 citationsOpen Access

Risk factors for pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement: a single centre experience

GLGiuseppe Limongelli

Key Points

  • To identify perioperative clinical predictors associated with the need for permanent pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement.
  • Prospective cohort study of 276 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Structured PICO

What are the perioperative clinical predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement?

P
Population
276 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, including 267 patients (mean age 57.5 years) with no conduction disturbances and 9 patients (mean age 67.7 years) with severe conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacing.
I
Intervention
Aortic valve replacement
O
Outcome
Permanent pacemaker implantation due to irreversible second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) blockhard clinical

Preoperative aortic regurgitation, myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, and postoperative electrolyte imbalance are significant independent predictors of the need for permanent pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement.

Limitations

  • Single center experience

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify perioperative clinical predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study on 276 patients submitted for aortic valve replacement: 267 patients (mean (SD) age, 57.5 (14) years) with no conduction disturbances, and nine patients (67.7 (5) years) with severe conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacing; 65 perioperative variables (38 preoperative, eight intraoperative, and 19 postoperative) were considered. RESULTS: Nine patients (3.2%) had irreversible second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block requiring permanent pacing. Risk factors for permanent pacing identified by univariate analysis were: preoperative: additional valvar disease, aortic regurgitation, myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, anaemia, use of digitalis; intraoperative: cardiac arrest; postoperative: cardiac arrest, conduction disturbances, electrolytic imbalance, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified preoperative aortic regurgitation (p < 0.005; odds ratio (OR) 6.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 12.2), myocardial infarction (p < 0.0005; OR 15.2, 95% CI 6.3 to 19.9), pulmonary hypertension (p < 0.005; OR 12.5, 95% CI 3.2 to 18.3), and postoperative electrolyte imbalance (p < 0.01; OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.4). CONCLUSIONS: Irreversible AV block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation is an uncommon condition following aortic valve replacement. Previous aortic regurgitation, myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, and postoperative electrolyte imbalance should be considered in order to identify patients at increased risk for advanced AV block.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giuseppe Limongelli (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83f73dff78c9927a998191https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.8.901
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper