PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1990Hypertension41 citations

Central and peripheral actions of a nonpeptidic angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

View Full Paper
JKJ P KoepkePBPhilippe R. BovyEMEllen G. McMahon

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Nonpeptidic imidazole derivatives were recently reported to be angiotensin II receptor antagonists with acute blood pressure-lowering activity. In the present study, we characterized the angiotensin II receptor antagonist properties of one such derivative, 4'-(2-butyl-4-chloro-5-(hydroxymethyl)-1H-imidazol-1-ylmethyl)- 1,1'-biphenyl-2-carboxylic acid (IMI). In receptor binding studies, IMI displaced bound 125Iangiotensin II from rat uterine membranes with an IC50 of 0.17 microM. In isolated rabbit aortic rings, IMI shifted the angiotensin II concentration-response curve to the right in a parallel and concentration-dependent manner. A Schild plot of these data indicated a pA2 of 7.13 +/- 0.16 and a slope of 0.94 +/- 0.06. In rat kidney slices, IMI shifted the concentration-response curve for angiotensin II-induced inhibition of renin release to the right. Antagonism of the angiotensin II pressor response by IMI was dose dependent and reversible in ganglion-blocked, anesthetized rats. The water intake and pressor responses to intracerebroventricular angiotensin II (100 pmol) were inhibited by intracerebroventricular IMI (25 or 50 nmol) in conscious Sprague-Dawley rats. Similarly, the drinking and pressor responses to intravenous angiotensin II were blocked by intravenous IMI in conscious rats. IMI alone had no effects on mean arterial pressure or drinking when administered either intravenously or intracerebroventricularly. IMI decreased mean arterial pressure throughout 5 days of infusion in spontaneously hypertensive rats. In summary, IMI was a full competitive antagonist without partial agonist activity in peripheral tissues and the central nervous system. Moreover, the chronic administration of this angiotensin II receptor antagonist was antihypertensive in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koepke et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a885ac88e586ad1c8a55329https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.15.6.841
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evidence that the apparent complexity of receptor antagonism by angiotensin II analogues is due to a reversible and syntopic action1992 · 65 citations
  2. 2Interactions of Nonpeptide Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists at Imidazoline/Guanidinium Receptor Sites in Rat Forebrain1996 · 14 citations
  3. 3Interactions of Ligands at Angiotensin II-Receptors and Imidazoline Receptors2001 · 4 citations
  4. 4A new series of imidazolones: highly specific and potent nonpeptide AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonists1993 · 109 citations
  5. 5Pharmacology of Antagonists of Angiotensin I and II1972 · 41 citations