PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 16, 2021British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology16 citationsOpen Access

Improving appropriate use of anticoagulants in hospitalised patients: A pharmacist‐led Check of Medication Appropriateness intervention

View Full Paper
CQCharlotte QuintensPVPeter VerhammeTVThomas Vanassche

Structured PICO

Does a pharmacist-led Check of Medication Appropriateness intervention reduce anticoagulant-related potentially inappropriate prescriptions in hospitalized patients?

P
Population
951 hospitalized patients with potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) related to anticoagulants (466 in pre-implementation cohort, 485 in post-implementation cohort).
I
Intervention
Pharmacist-led Check of Medication Appropriateness (CMA) comprising 13 clinical rules pertaining to anticoagulation therapies.
C
Comparator
Usual care (pre-implementation cohort).
O
Outcome
Number of residual potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) persisting up to 48 hours after the intervention.safety

A pharmacist-led Check of Medication Appropriateness intervention significantly reduces potentially inappropriate anticoagulant prescriptions in hospitalized patients.

Abstract

AIMS: Inappropriate anticoagulant use increases the risk of bleeding and thrombotic events. We implemented clinical decision rules to promote judicious medication use, as part of the 'Check of Medication Appropriateness' (CMA). The CMA is a pharmacist-led review service, targeting potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). In this analysis, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the CMA on anticoagulant prescribing. METHODS: The number of anticoagulant-related PIPs was evaluated before and after implementation of the intervention in a quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis. The pre-implementation cohort received usual care. The anticoagulant-focused CMA, comprising 13 clinical rules pertaining to anticoagulation therapies, was implemented in the post-implementation cohort. Segmented regression analysis was used to assess the impact of the intervention on the number of residual PIPs. A residual PIP was defined as a PIP which persisted up to 48 hours after the CMA intervention. Total number of recommendations and acceptance rate were documented for the 2-year post-implementation period. RESULTS: Pre-implementation, we observed 501 PIPs in 466 inpatients on 36 days, with a median proportion of 78.5% (range: 46.2%-100%) residual PIPs per day. Post-implementation, 538 PIPs were detected in 485 patients over the same number of days. The CMA intervention reduced the median proportion to 18.2% (range: 0-100%) per day. The effect coincided with an immediate relative reduction of 70% (95%CI 0.19-0.46) in anticoagulant-related residual PIPs. Post-implementation, 2778 recommendations were provided and 75.1% were accepted. CONCLUSION: Our CMA approach significantly reduced anticoagulant-related PIPs. Implementing a pharmacist-led intervention, based on clinical rules, may support safer prescribing of anticoagulants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quintens et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a968e9e1f16343146bb81e7https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15184
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper