Organizational forms of providing assistance to citizens when seeking judicial protection in the context of court informatization

The article discusses organizational forms of providing assistance to citizens when seeking judicial protection in the context of court informatization. The importance of considering digital platforms as a structure of the judicial system necessitates a theoretical justification of its informational characteristics as necessary guarantees of the unity of the judicial system in the remote exercise of organizational and procedural rights by interested parties, which determines the relevance of the article. The object of the study is the legal relations related to the organization of court activities in the context of informatization. The subject of the study is the principles and norms of law that regulate the legal relations related to the organization of court activities. The methodological basis consists of the dialectical method, general and specific scientific methods of cognition. The features of the information model of court organization are: the construction of the judicial system on the basis of an information platform, which, along with the set of judicial institutions established by law, provides for the existence of digital platforms that unite participants in judicial proceedings in the digital space; the inclusion of forms of conciliation in the structure of court activities, which expands the tasks of the court, aiming at a multi-level settlement of disputes, including through online conciliation based on the use of digital technologies. The expansion of the concept of court activity by including conciliation in the activities of courts, which consists in carrying out conciliation procedures, including online conciliation, in the courtroom or with the participation of the court, or with the help of digital platforms, is justified. The organizational forms of citizens’ access to mediation and conciliation procedures in court premises are justified, as well as the integration of media services and other structures that carry out conciliation with the digital platform. Guarantees include organizational forms of assistance to individuals seeking judicial protection, including: the creation of a network of state institutions that provide opportunities for remote access to the court; innovative models of court reception as a service to citizens, expanding the tasks of court staff in terms of receiving citizens and providing advisory and technical assistance.