As artificial intelligence systems increasingly govern public safety operations, concerns over algorithmic fairness and legal compliance intensify. This study introduces a scenario-based evaluation framework (SCRAM) that simultaneously measures regulatory conformity and bias risks in AI-enabled surveillance. Using license plate recognition (LPR) systems in Türkiye as a case study, we simulate multiple operational configurations that vary decision thresholds and data retention periods. Each configuration is assessed through fairness metrics (SPD, DIR) and a compliance score derived from KVKK (Türkiye’s Personal Data Protection Law) and constitutional jurisprudence. Our findings show that technical performance does not guarantee normative acceptability: several configurations with high detection accuracy fail to meet legal and fairness thresholds. The SCRAM model offers a modular and adaptable approach to align AI deployments with ethical and legal standards and highlights how policy-sensitive parameters critically shape risk landscapes. We conclude with implications for real-time audit systems and cross-jurisdictional AI governance.
Kesgin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: