This paper argues that establishing foundational discipline theories represents humanity's most profound intellectual achievement, surpassing even Nobel Prize-winning discoveries in transformative impact. During Newton's era, the absence of peer review systems and emphasis on mathematical-logical revelation of natural phenomena enabled unprecedented theoretical development. However, modern scientific culture, dominated by empirical orthodoxy, SCI impact factor metrics, and the misguided belief that "experiment is the sole criterion for theory validation," has systematically devalued theoretical research. Contemporary scientists erroneously view theoretical articles as mere opinion pieces, denying the existence of absolute truths such as energy conservation, mass conservation, and thermodynamic laws. This empirical fundamentalism reduces science to mere experimental data accumulation, resembling pre-scientific alchemy rather than genuine scientific inquiry. The establishment of wave mechanics theory for microwave absorption exemplifies genuine discipline theory construction, revealing fundamental electromagnetic principles through mathematical analysis. Modern education has regressed from its greatest achievement—theoretical learning in classrooms that distinguishes humans from animals—toward vocational training emphasizing practical skills over theoretical understanding. Graduate education has devolved into apprenticeship models prioritizing laboratory experimentation over theoretical mastery of humanity's greatest intellectual accomplishments. This paper demonstrates that theoretical research constitutes the highest form of scientific investigation, with experimental work serving theoretical advancement rather than replacing it. The systematic devaluation of theoretical innovation represents a fundamental threat to scientific progress and human intellectual development.
Yue Liu (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: