PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 20250 citations

The Short End of the Stick: Bolstering Legal Protections for Short Sellers in Ontario’s Secondary Market

View Full Paper
JMJacob Medvedev

Key Points

  • Legal clarity is needed for short sellers in Ontario's securities market, aiming to enhance their protections.
  • The review found that current disclosure obligations and enforcement mechanisms inadequately support short sellers.
  • Strengthening legal protections could improve market efficiency and foster better price discovery for stocks.
  • The proposed reforms emphasize a duty of care and revised damage calculations to better compensate short sellers.

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, the author surveys Ontario’s secondary market civil liability framework. The author reviews the constituent continuous disclosure obligations as well as the enforcement mechanisms that are available under common law and statute. The author then explores how short sellers fit into Ontario’s secondary market securities laws. Avenues of legal recourse have seemingly crystallized for ordinary investors who are misled by reporting issuers in the secondary market. However, Ontario’s securities laws are unclear regarding the legal redress that is available to aggrieved short sellers who are resigned to a similar fate. To address this gap, the author argues in favour of strengthening legal protections for short sellers by: (1) recognizing a duty of care owed by public issuers to short sellers; and (2) revising the damage calculation formulas in Part XXIII.1 of Ontario’s Securities Act to ensure that they are capable of compensating short sellers in a manner that is commensurate with their investment position. In doing so, Ontario could better position itself as a robust securities market that provides adequate legal safeguards for diverse types of investors. Moreover, the implementation of remedial measures for short sellers may create market conditions that encourage the spread of negative information about stocks, paving the way for greater accuracy in the price discovery of shares and bolstered market efficiency overall.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jacob Medvedev (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1e30854b1d3bfb6100929https://doi.org/10.3138/ccar.v17i1.053
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Some Reflections on The “Responsible Issuer” Definition and Jurisdictional Aspects of Securities Class Actions2012
  2. 2Mi Casa Es Su Casa: <i>Van Breda</i> as the House Rule for Global Securities Class Actions in Ontario2015
  3. 3A Survey of Short-Selling Regulations2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Whither Common Law Claims for Secondary Market Misrepresentation?: An Analysis of Certification Decisions in <i>McCann V CP Ships, Silver V Imax, Mckenna V Gammon Gold, and Dobbie V Arctic Glacier</i>2011
  5. 5With Whom Is Your Issue?: Use of Investor Sophistication in Defining the Scope of Seller Liability Under § 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 19332025