What type of study is this?

This is a Quantitative Study study.

September 20, 2025

Coordinating Plans for Fire Protection Facilities

Key Points

Focusing solely on one strategy, like building more lookouts, may not provide the best fire protection outcomes.
In the Oregon ranger district assessment, the costs and average fire fighters needed per incident were evaluated for different strategies.
Combining strategies such as constructing roads and increasing fire fighters could yield a more effective fire management system.
Understanding the mixed impacts of these approaches is crucial for resource allocation and minimizing fire risk.

Abstract

Abstract The author here describes an attack on a very timely and important problem. If a fire administrator wants to obtain maximum protection from fire on a forest unit at the least annual cost, what should he do: build more lookouts? construct more roads and trails? or put more fire guards or fire fighters in the area? The author assumes, as has often been suspected, that no one set formula will apply everywhere. Accordingly, for a particular ranger district in Oregon he tries in turn to determine what the effect would be of concentrating only on one formula and measuring the result in terms of both the cost of the facilities and the average number of fire fighters it would probably take per fire; he then concentrates on another; then on combinations of both, etc. He uses the results as a measure of the relative desirability of the different combinations.

Bookmark

Coordinating Plans for Fire Protection Facilities

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider