This article explores the origins and ethnolinguistic identity of the Etruscans, an ancient people who inhabited central-western Italy during the early first millennium BCE. Ancient Greek and Roman writers consistently emphasized the Etruscans’ uniqueness, particularly in their language, religious customs, and material culture. However, these sources offered competing explanations for their homeland. The eastern origin theory, supported by Herodotus and Hellanicus, suggests that the Etruscans migrated from Lydia (Maionia) in western Anatolia during the upheavals of the Late Bronze Age. According to this account, they were part of the Sea Peoples known as the Turša or Tereš, who appear in Egyptian records from the 12th century BCE. Linguistic similarities between Etruscan and the language of the Lemnian inscription, along with cultural and religious parallels to Anatolian traditions, lend support to this theory. In contrast, Dionysius of Halicarnassus denied any foreign origin, arguing that the Etruscans were autochthonous to Italy. He based this view on differences in language, religion, and social institutions between the Etruscans and the Lydians. Some modern scholars agree, citing the continuity between Villanovan and Etruscan archaeological phases and the lack of clear evidence for mass migration. A third theory, now largely abandoned, posits a northern or Alpine origin, connecting the Etruscans with the Raetians. This paper reconsiders all three views and concludes that the balance of evidence, particularly from linguistic and archaeological sources, points toward an eastern origin with later integration into the Italic cultural landscape. The Etruscans appear to have settled in Etruria between the Tiber and Arno rivers, where they gradually gained dominance and gave their name to both the region and the Tyrrhenian Sea. Despite ongoing debates, the Etruscans’ legacy remains vital for understanding the cultural foundations of early Rome.
KAYA et al. (Thu,) studied this question.