In-cylinder pressure provides critical insights for analyzing and optimizing combustion in internal combustion engines, yet its acquisition across the full operating space requires extensive testing, while physics-based models are computationally demanding. Machine learning (ML) offers an alternative, but its application to direct reconstruction of full pressure traces remains limited. This study evaluates three strategies for reconstructing cylinder pressure under unmeasured operating conditions, establishing a machine learning-assisted framework that generates the complete pressure–crank angle (P–CA) trace. The framework treats crank angle and operating conditions as inputs and predicts either pressure directly or apparent heat release rate (HRR) as an intermediate variable, which is then integrated to reconstruct pressure. In all approaches, discrete pointwise predictions are combined to form the full P–CA curve. Direct pressure prediction achieves high accuracy for overall traces but underestimates HRR-related combustion features. Training on HRR improves combustion representation but introduces baseline shifts in reconstructed pressure. A hybrid approach, combining non-combustion pressure prediction with combustion-phase HRR-based reconstruction delivers the most robust and physically consistent results. These findings demonstrate that ML can efficiently reconstruct in-cylinder pressure at unmeasured conditions, reducing experimental requirements while supporting combustion diagnostics, calibration, and digital twin applications.
Huang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: