Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Case Presentation: A 63-year-old female presented to our emergency department with altered mental status and hypotension. She was transferred from the outpatient interventional radiology suite after becoming unresponsive during the removal of an inferior vena cava filter. The patient arrived somnolent with no other history available. Her physical exam was unremarkable. We used point-of-care-ultrasound to perform a rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension (RUSH) exam. A large pericardial effusion along with signs of cardiac tamponade were identified. The cardiothoracic surgery team was notified, and the patient was taken to the operating room where pericardial blood and a large hematoma were evacuated. She recovered uneventfully and was discharged one week later. Discussion: The above case describes a very unstable patient whose diagnosis was obtained using the RUSH exam. History and physical did not point to a clear etiology. Options were very limited. She was too unstable to go for computed tomography, and other tests such as electrocardiogram, chest radiograph, and lab work would have been non-diagnostic. It was only after the cardiac view of the RUSH exam was obtained that a pericardial effusion and developing tamponade were identified, facilitating timely management. The RUSH exam, like the extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma, is used to help determine pathologies that need immediate intervention. Incorporation in the evaluation of critically ill patients reduces the time to diagnosis. Our case is a unique example of how point-of-care ultrasound can be used to urgently identify a life-threatening pathology.
Berger et al. (Sat,) studied this question.