IVIM parameters mapping with artificial neural network based on mean deviation prior

Abstract Background The diffusion and perfusion parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging provide promising biomarkers for noninvasively quantifying and managing various diseases. Nevertheless, due to the distribution gap between simulated and real datasets, the out‐of‐distribution (OOD) problem occurred in supervised learning‐based methods degrades their performance and hinders their real applications. Purpose To address the OOD problem in supervised methods and to further improve the accuracy and stability of IVIM parameter estimation, this work proposes a novel learning framework called IterANN, based on mean deviation prior (MDP) between training and estimated IVIM parameters on the test set. Methods Specifically, MDP indicates that the mean of the estimated IVIM parameters always locates between the mean of IVIM parameters in the test and train sets. In IterANN, we adopt a very simple artificial neural network (ANN) architecture of two hidden layers with 12 neurons per hidden layer, an input layer containing the signals acquired at multiple b ‐values and an output layer composed of three IVIM parameters (, and ). Inspired by MDP, the distribution of IVIM parameters in the training set (simulated data) is iteratively updated so that their mean gradually approaches the predicted values of the real data. This aims to achieve a strong correlation between the simulated data and the real data. To validate the effectiveness of IterANN, we compare it with several methods on both simulation and real acquisition datasets, including 21 healthy and 3 tumor subjects, in terms of residual errors of IVIM parameters or DW signals, the coefficients of variation (CV) of IVIM parameters, and the parameter contrast‐to‐noise ratio (PCNR) between normal and tumor tissues. Results On two simulation datasets, the proposed IterANN achieves the lowest residual error in IVIM parameters, especially in the case of low signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR = 10), the residual error of , and is decreased by (Gaussian distribution /realistic distribution) respectively comparing to the suboptimal method. On real dataset, the IterANN achieves the highest PCNR when comparing the normal and tumor regions. Additionally, the proposed IterANN demonstrated better stability, with its CV being significantly lower than that of other methods in the vast majority of cases (, paired‐sample Student's t ‐test). Conclusions The superior performance of IterANN demonstrates that updating the distribution of the train set based on MDP can effectively solve the OOD problem, which allows us not only to improve the accuracy and stability of the estimated IVIM parameters, but also to increase the potential of IVIM in disease diagnosis.