Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carter et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a5efb6db64358753feeb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17896
Josh Carter
University of Bath
Xi Chen
Heilongjiang University of Technology
Dario Cazzola
University of Bath
PeerJ
University of Bath
Teesside University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: