PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 26, 202410 citationsOpen Access

X-ray AGN in Bo\"otes: The lack of growth of the most massive black holes since z=4

View Full Paper
PGPaloma GuetzoyanJAJames AirdAGA. Georgakakis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Supermassive Black Holes (BHs) are known to efficiently grow through gas accretion, but even sustained and intense mass build-up through this mechanism struggles to explain the assembly of the most massive BHs observed in the local Universe. Using the Chandra Deep-Wide Field Survey (CDFWS) in the Bo\"otes field, we measure BH--galaxy assembly in massive galaxies (M₁0^10 M_) through the AGN fraction and specific Black Hole accretion rate (sBHAR) distribution as a function of redshift and stellar mass. We determine stellar masses and star formation rates for a parent sample of optically selected galaxies as well as those with X-ray detections indicating the presence of an AGN through Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) fitting. We derive a redshift-dependent mass completeness limit and extract X-ray information for every galaxy as to provide a comprehensive picture of the AGN population in massive galaxies. While X-ray AGN samples are dominated by moderately massive host galaxies of M_ 10^10 M_, we do not find a strong stellar mass dependence in AGN fraction (to limits in sBHAR), indicating a bias towards massive galaxies in the observed samples. We derive BH-galaxy growth tracks over time, which reveal that while most BH mass has been accumulated since z=4 for lower mass BHs, the assembly of the most massive BHs is more complex, with little to no relative mass gain since z=4, implying that rapid and intense growth episodes prior to z=4 were necessary to form these massive BHs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guetzoyan et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b010b6db643587549257https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2564
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Relationship of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies at z < 4 in the Deep Optical Variability-selected Active Galactic Nuclei Sample in the COSMOS Field2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2A candidate supermassive black hole in a gravitationally-lensed galaxy at $z\approx10$2024
  3. 3Mapping the Growth of Supermassive Black Holes as a Function of Galaxy Stellar Mass and Redshift2024 · 23 citations
  4. 4Super-Eddington accretion in high-redshift black holes and the emergence of jetted AGN2024
  5. 5Super-Eddington accretion in high-redshift black holes and the emergence of jetted AGN2024 · 1 citations