Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This study presents a comprehensive comparative study of three prominent haptic gloves, covering technical specifications such as glove sensitivity in real-world applications. The central hypothesis posits that the superior glove will demonstrate enhanced capabilities in realistic motion and control, consequently leading to broader applicability. The findings are anticipated to offer valuable insights into the relative performance of these gloves and guide their deployment in education, training, and marketing fields. The evaluation methodology comprises a meticulous examination of technical specifications, provided by haptic glove manufacturers and practical implementations, on custom-developed VR environments that include medical, manufacturing, and entertainment industries. The study involves undergraduate students developing custom-constructed VR applications, and collecting and analyzing data for Manus Prime 3, SenseGlove Nova, and bHaptics TactGlove haptic gloves. Randomly selected participants experienced immersive environments using three haptic gloves for comfort, virtual vs actual touch response rates, and ease of use overall. This ongoing study reports the outcomes of comparative analyses using SPSS' One-Way ANOVA, Paired, and Independent Sample t-Tests. Preliminary test results suggest that SenseGlove Nova provides the most significant enhancement and experiences in training professionals. A general objective of this study is to contribute to the expanding field of haptic technology by providing a detailed comparative analysis that informs practitioners and researchers in their pursuit of immersive and interactive experiences.
Dakeev et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: