July 8, 2024Open Access

Comparison of real data and simulated data analysis of a stopping rule based on the standard error of measurement in computerized adaptive testing for medical examinations in Korea: a psychometric study

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare and evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) under 2 stopping rules (standard error of measurement SEM=0.3 and 0.25) using both real and simulated data in medical examinations in Korea.

Read Full Paperexternally

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seo et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e61090b6db6435875a3b2f https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.18

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Comparing computer adaptive testing stopping rules under the generalized partial-credit model2018 · 23 citations
2Random Generation of Response Patterns under Computerized Adaptive Testing with the<i>R</i>Package<b>catR</b>2012 · 113 citations
3Projection-Based Stopping Rules for Computerized Adaptive Testing in Licensure Testing2017 · 6 citations
4Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing/certification examinations2017 · 27 citations
5Introduction to the LIVECAT web-based computerized adaptive testing platform2020 · 12 citations

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper