Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose: This research aims to provide an overview of justice-based reconstruction regarding quality accountability in the legal profession, specifically focusing on the Advocate Organization System within Indonesia's legal framework. Theoretical Framework: Grounded in Article 28 paragraph 1 of Law Number 18 of 2003, this study delves into the unique position of Advocate Organizations as the sole free and independent professional body for Advocates. It explores how these organizations contribute to enhancing the quality of legal advocacy while upholding principles of justice. Method: The research adopts a normative juridical approach, analyzing legal norms, principles, applicable laws, regulations, legal theories, and doctrines pertinent to the subject matter. It synthesizes insights from legal science and relevant literature to inform the organizational restructuring of Advocate Organizations. Result and Discussion: Through comprehensive analysis, this study proposes two key strategies for enhancing accountability and quality within the Advocate Organization System. Firstly, the formation of a National Team of Advocates and Advocate Honorary Council is advocated to establish an integrated governance structure. Secondly, the implementation of Standard Curriculum and Examination Standards in Advocate Education is recommended to ensure competency and ethical conduct among legal professionals. Originality/Value: This research contributes novel perspectives to the discourse on legal certainty within professional organizations, particularly Advocates. By emphasizing justice-oriented quality standards, it offers practical insights for regulatory improvements and organizational enhancements. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of legal certainty and accountability mechanisms within the Advocate Organization System. By implementing the proposed strategies, the legal profession can align more effectively with principles of justice, thereby enhancing public trust and professional integrity.
Sunaryo et al. (Tue,) studied this question.