Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Ethereum smart contracts are a special type of computer programs. Once deployed on the blockchain, they cannot be modified. This presents a significant challenge to the security of smart contracts. Previous research has proposed static and dynamic detection tools to identify vulnerabilities in smart contracts. These tools check contract vulnerabilities based on predefined rules, and the accuracy of detection strongly depends on the design of the rules. However, the constant emergence of new vulnerability types and strategies for vulnerability protection leads to numerous false positives and false negatives by tools. To address this problem, we analyze the characteristics of vulnerabilities in smart contracts and the corresponding protection strategies. We convert the contracts' bytecode into an intermediate representation to extract semantic information of the contracts. Based on this semantic information, we establish a set of detection rules based on semantic facts and implement a vulnerability detection tool SafeCheck using static program analysis methods. The tool is used to detect six common types of vulnerabilities in smart contracts. We have extensively evaluated SafeCheck on real Ethereum smart contracts and compared it to other tools. The experimental results show that SafeCheck performs better in smart contract vulnerability detection compared to other typical tools, with a high F‐measure (up to 83.1%) for its entire dataset.
Chen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.