Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Introduction The prevalence of male sexual dysfunction (MSD) increases with age, with greater than 50% of men aged over 40 years reporting erectile dysfunction (ED). In recent years, wearable male sex devices (WMSDs) have been both increasingly utilized by patients and recommended by sexual medicine clinicians. Objective This study seeks to investigate the safety and efficacy of products currently marketed for the treatment of MSD. Methods Available products for WMSDs were reviewed by analyzing product websites, forums, advertisements, and clinical recommendations. Qualitative comparisons were made based on patient reviews, cost, and specific features of each device. Investigatory evidence and FDA status were also reviewed (Figure 1). Additionally, Google Trends was used to determine the popularity of different devices over time (Figure 2). Results Eight WMSDs for the treatment of MSD and enhancement of sexual pleasure were reviewed. Constriction bands, such as the Maintain Ring Loop, Eddie by Giddy, and Xialla, have shown significant benefits in clinical trials and were found to be the most popular devices among patients. Smart devices can provide real-time feedback on erectile quality and/or sexual performance. Similar to the Rigiscan, the ADAM sensor provides feedback on erectile quality while also monitoring changes in penile tumescence during sleep with additional analysis available through a mobile application. Neuromodulation devices like Morari Patch and vPatch/in2 patch use electrical stimulation to delay ejaculation and improve sexual function. The FirmTech Performance Ring uses sensors to track the vital signs of erectile fitness with clinical trials ongoing. Conclusions Overall, this review describes the available investigatory evidence for a range of WMSDs and highlights the potential benefits and limitations of these devices in treating MSD and enhancing sexual pleasure. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these devices and to determine which ones may be the most suitable for individual patients. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Charles A Loeb, MD - None relevant Muhammad A M Hammad, MBBCh - None relevant David W Barham, MD - None relevant Jake Miller MD - None relevant Kirsten Young, MS - None relevant Rainey Horwitz, MD – Paid collaboration with FirmTech on Instagram Eliad Amini, BS - None relevant Mai Xuan Nguyen, BS - None relevant Nitish Nag, MD, PhD - None relevant Lawrence Jenkins, MD – None relevant Amy M Pearlman, MD – Consultant for/received grant funding from Boston Scientific; consultant for Endo Pharmaceuticals; consultant for FirmTech; investor in ByteMD; influencer in Urology Times Faysal A Yafi, MD – Advisory board and speaker for Coloplast; consultant for Cynosure; advisory board and speaker for Halozyme; intellectual property with Masimo; advisory board for Promescent; consultant for Sprout; advisory board for Xialla.
Hammad et al. (Fri,) studied this question.