Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
During the Architecture and Urban Design IV studio (DAU IV), within the second year of the Architecture program (PUCE-FADA), the students most build and apply diverse construction systems in a project; we have noticed that manual knowledge is being lost. In the curricular design of architectural workshops most of the projects are based on digital media, yet analogical tools, like our own hands, could be vital to develop a broad experience in construction and a critical thinking. Due to this, the new curriculum has an emphasis in construction practice. Through a perspective of neuroscience education, this paper analyzes the program and the exercises developed during the studio. Some of the neuroscience pedagogic principles will evaluate the DAU IV studio: emotions and learning, real-life experiences, contextual learning and intrinsic motivation. The authors then critically review which of the activities developed are suitable and encouraging for addressing a practical learning. Recommendations will be outlined for future versions of the studio.
Rodriguez et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: