Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BackgroundAdolescents' diets have been overlooked in nutrition information systems, interventions, and policies. The Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W) indicator has been validated to signal greater micronutrient adequacy among non-pregnant women from low- and middle-income countries, but there is limited evidence for valid food group thresholds among boys or non-pregnant non-lactating girls.MethodsThis multi-country study evaluated the test characteristics of a 10-point food group diversity score (FGDS) – underlying MDD-W – and food group thresholds to predict the micronutrient adequacy of diets from single 24-hour recalls or food diaries (24-HRs) among 83,935 adolescents aged 10-19 years and repeated 24-HRs among 75,480 adolescents from upper-middle and high income countries.ResultsFGDS was lowest among adolescents in lower-middle countries (3.5 ± 1.1) and greatest in high income countries (5.4 ± 1.3 points). Using single 24-HRs, one-point increments in FGDS performed identically to predict higher Mean Adequacy Ratio (MAR) among boys and girls (5.1 percentage points; 95% CI: 5.0-5.2; P 0.60 among adolescents from upper-middle and high income countries, whereas a ≥4 food group cut-off showed superior balance between sensitivity, specificity, and percentage correctly classified in low (only girls) and lower-middle income countries (boys and girls). In contrast, using repeated 24-HRs, the Mean Probability of Adequacy (MPA) levels among adolescents were too high and homogeneous (i.e., all MPAs >0.60) to define an optimal food group threshold.ConclusionMDD-W can be extended to boys and girls aged 10-19 years from upper-middle and high income countries. Furthermore, an adapted indicator using a ≥4 food group threshold signals higher micronutrient adequacy in low and lower-middle income countries. Food group cut-offs to predict the micronutrient adequacy of usual intakes should be validated using repeated 24-HRs in populations where a lower proportion of adolescents meet average dietary requirements.
Hanley‐Cook et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: