What type of study is this?

October 18, 2025Open Access

Effectiveness of Functional Magnetic Stimulation versus Conventional Physiotherapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome of Upper Trapezius: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Points

Functional Magnetic Stimulation significantly reduces pain severity in patients with myofascial pain syndrome.
Primary outcome measures include pain severity measured by the Visual Analogue Scale and cervical range of motion.
This randomized controlled trial involves 54 participants, split into two groups receiving either FMS or conventional physiotherapy.
FMS may improve treatment effectiveness, providing a promising non-invasive alternative to conventional physiotherapy.

Abstract

Background Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the upper trapezius is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), leading to pain, disability, and diminished quality of life. Traditional physiotherapy, despite its prevalence, frequently offers merely transient alleviation. Functional Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) is an innovative, non-invasive technique that elicits painless, repeated muscle contractions using pulsed electromagnetic fields, potentially targeting underlying pathology. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Functional Magnetic Stimulation versus traditional physiotherapy in alleviating pain, enhancing cervical range of motion (ROM), and diminishing disability in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the upper trapezius. Methods This parallel-group, randomized controlled experiment enrolled 54 patients aged 18 to 45 years with active myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either FMS therapy (Group A) or Conventional physiotherapy (Group B). Interventions were administered thrice weekly for a duration of three weeks. The primary outcome was pain severity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary objectives encompassed cervical range of motion assessed with a goniometer and disability evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Evaluations were conducted at baseline and after three weeks by a blinded evaluator. Conclusion This study aims to provide protocol to evident the effectiveness of FMS relative to Conventional physiotherapy for the management of MPS. By overcoming the shortcomings of current therapies, FMS has the capacity to enhance patient outcomes in a timely and non-invasive fashion. Trial registration: The study is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI/2024/05/067997).

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mishra et al. (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f3793258f37cefb60d34b1 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2025.1409000091

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

Bookmark

View Full Paper