South Africa has not yet enacted a specific legislative ban on conversion practices. This is despite widespread international consensus that so-called conversion practices—aimed at changing an individual's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression—are harmful, unethical, and violate fundamental human rights. This omission is particularly striking given South Africa's globally lauded Constitution, which enshrines the rights to equality, dignity, and bodily and psychological integrity, and is often celebrated for its progressive protection of LGBTQ+ persons. This article critically examines the dissonance between South Africa's constitutional values and its legal silence on conversion practices, especially as they relate to vulnerable groups. Drawing on domestic jurisprudence, international human rights law, and comparative legislative developments from jurisdictions such as Australia and Germany, the article argues that the continued permissibility of conversion practices in South Africa constitutes a systemic failure to fulfil both constitutional obligations and international commitments. It also examines the professional stances adopted by organizations such as the Psychological Society of South Africa and critiques the limitations of relying solely on ethical guidelines in the absence of statutory or criminal sanctions. The article concludes with a call for urgent legal reform, proposing a rights-based legislative framework that expressly prohibits conversion practices and aligns South Africa's domestic law with its constitutional ethos and global human rights standards.
Sophy Baird (Thu,) studied this question.