Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The idea of a living environment may sound abstract, but it becomes visible in the way people live day to day—the quality of their housing, the work they do, their openness to modern practices, and the steady efforts they make to improve their standard of living. In this study, these aspects were examined through field research carried out in 23 villages situated in the peri-urban belt of Ahmedabad, India. Variables included dwelling type and density, fuels for domestic use, electricity, access to water, sanitation, transport, and household hygiene. To interpret the findings, the Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework was applied, which has been increasingly used in environmental and urban studies since 2020 (Benevolo Rosado, 2024). The results show that urban growth and in-migration are major drivers, creating pressures on land, services, and infrastructure, which alter the state of settlements into congested, poorly serviced neighbourhoods. This produces impacts including waste build- up, ecological stress, and declining health, while responses from governance remain partial. These findings resonate with emerging work on peri-urban transformation and sustainable infrastructure in India (Kundu, 2021; UN-Habitat, 2022; World Bank, 2023; Singh & Sharma, 2024).
Swati Kothary (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: