PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2026Genes3 citationsOpen Access

Expanded Carrier Screening: Current Evidence and Future Directions in the Era of Population Genomics

View Full Paper
LPLucrezia PilenziVSVincenzo ScorranoSRSara Di Rado

Key Points

  • This mini-review synthesizes current evidence on expanded carrier screening (ECS) and its implications for reproductive genetics.
  • Reviewed literature on expanded carrier screening and genetic variants.
  • Analyzed the impact of next-generation sequencing on clinical applications.
  • Discussed the use of ancestry-informed gene panels for diverse populations.
  • Identified challenges in gene panel composition and interpretation frameworks.
  • Showed how population-scale genomic resources enhance understanding of variant frequencies.
  • Highlighted the importance of considering pathogenic variants linked to euploid pregnancy losses.

Abstract

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) has emerged as a cornerstone of reproductive genetics, enabling the identification of couples at risk of transmitting autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. Advances in next-generation sequencing and the increasing adoption of exome- and genome-based strategies have greatly expanded its clinical scope. However, despite existing national and international recommendations, substantial heterogeneity remains in gene panel composition, inclusion criteria, and interpretation frameworks. A key novelty of the current genomic era is the availability of large, publicly accessible human genome datasets encompassing broader ancestral diversity. These resources are transforming our understanding of variant frequencies and disease penetrance across populations, supporting the development of evidence-based and ancestry-informed gene panels. In parallel, recent studies investigating the genetic contribution of pathogenic variants to euploid pregnancy losses are opening new perspectives for ECS. Incorporating genes associated with lethal conditions in utero may enhance the predictive power of screening and deepen our understanding of reproductive outcomes, while also demanding careful consideration of clinical validity and counseling implications. This mini-review synthesizes current evidence on ECS, examines ongoing interpretive and implementation challenges, and discusses how population-scale genomic resources and emerging data on reproductive lethality are shaping the next generation of evidence-based carrier screening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pilenzi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d8e503483e917927a5410https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17010058
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Expanded targeted preconception screening panel in Israel: findings and insights2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2The promises and pitfalls of automated variant interpretation: a comprehensive review2025 · 7 citations
  3. 3Population-based genetic screening for reproductive counseling: the Tay-Sachs disease model2000 · 224 citations
  4. 4Gene discovery informatics toolkit defines candidate genes for unexplained infertility and prenatal or infantile mortality2019 · 47 citations
  5. 5Genetic factors as potential molecular markers of human oocyte and embryo quality2021 · 111 citations