Abstract In both the 21st-century academic and professional environments, the ability to plan, reflect, and adapt demonstrates the most vital function. Although creativity is acknowledged as one of the pillars, formal education systems still tend to deprioritize it, as their primary focus is on prior knowledge and critical thinking, rendering creativity’s role in task execution and performance irrelevant. This research fills that gap by proposing the Creativity-Centric Academic Performance Model (CCAPM), a new way of thinking that shifts the focus from what determines academic success to creativity. The CCAPM enables the development of a new creative concept that combines cognition and prior learning, viewing task accomplishment as a recursive cycle integrating real-world tasks and feedback. In contrast to other models, CCAPM approaches define creativity as the central aspect, rather than the tools built on thinking processes that aid and embellish task performance. The application of the model is meant to address the weaknesses in the educational processes. It provides accurate tools for teachers, learners, institutions, and decision-makers to change curricula, breaking down disciplinary boundaries and using technology in learning. This research extends key findings, including that task completion is cyclic rather than linear, creativity is mediated by supporting processes and institutional blockages, and that resource availability and culture are barriers. Such information indicates that CCAPM can reconfigure the sequence of modern approaches, aligning it more closely with current needs and contexts that highlight the importance of innovation. CCAPM, likely, serves as the foundation for continuing education studies, where teaching creativity is warranted because it encompasses subjects like the visible structural factors influencing academic performance and the hidden ones that arise from broader aspects. This more holistic viewpoint enhances educational theory and offers a point of departure for implementing improvements that will serve children globally.
Setiawaty et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: