Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) is one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally. Disposable e-cigarettes are among the products that have gained popularity in recent years. Their complex construction and embedded lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) present environmental, safety, and resource recovery challenges. Despite growing research interest, integrated analyses linking material composition with user disposal behavior remain limited. This study is the first to incorporate device-level mass balance, material contamination assessment, battery residual charge measurements, and user behavior to evaluate the waste management challenges of disposable e-cigarettes. A mass balance of twelve types of devices on the Polish market was performed. Plastics dominated in five devices, while non-ferrous metals prevailed in the others, depending on casing design. Materials contaminated with e-liquid residues accounted for 4.4–10.7% of device mass. Battery voltage measurements revealed that 25.6% of recovered LIBs retained a residual charge (greater than 2.5 V), posing a direct fire hazard during waste handling and treatment. Moreover, it was estimated that 7 to 12 tons of lithium are introduced annually into the Polish market via disposable e-cigarettes, highlighting substantial resource potential. Survey results showed that 46% of users disposed of devices in mixed municipal waste, revealing a knowledge–practice gap largely independent of gender or education. Integrating technical and social findings demonstrates that improper handling is a systemic issue. The findings support the relevance of eco-design requirements, such as modular casings for battery removal, alongside the enforcement of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes. Current product fees (0.01–0.03 EUR/unit) remain insufficient to establish an effective collection infrastructure, highlighting a key systemic barrier.
Pasiecznik et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: