Metaphor is ubiquitous in daily communication and makes language expression more vivid. Identifying metaphorical words, known as metaphor detection, is crucial for capturing the real meaning of a sentence. As an important step of metaphorical understanding, the correct interpretation of metaphorical words directly affects metaphor detection. This article investigates how to use metaphor interpretation to enhance metaphor detection. Since previous approaches for metaphor interpretation are coarse-grained or constrained by ambiguous meanings of substitute words, we propose a different interpretation mechanism that explains metaphorical words by means of gloss-based interpretations. To comprehensively explore the optimal joint strategy, we go beyond previous work by designing diverse model architectures. We investigate both classification and sequence labeling paradigms, incorporating distinct component designs based on MIP and SPV theories. Furthermore, we integrate Part-of-Speech tags and external knowledge to further refine the feature representation. All methods utilize pre-trained language models to encode text and capture semantic information of the text. Since this mechanism involves both metaphor detection and metaphor interpretation but there is a lack of datasets annotated for both tasks, we have enhanced three datasets with glosses for metaphor detection: one Chinese dataset (PSUCMC) and two English datasets (TroFi and VUA). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed joint methods are superior to or at least comparable to state-of-the-art methods on the three enhanced datasets. Results confirm that joint learning of metaphor detection and gloss-based interpretation makes metaphor detection more accurate.
Liu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: