During LHC Run 3, the CMS experiment faces challenging pileup and high event rate conditions. To efficiently select events of interest, CMS utilizes a two-tiered triggering system. This system consists of the hardware-based level-1 trigger (L1T) and the software-based high-level trigger (HLT) that runs on a computing farm. The L1T utilizes coarse calorimeter and muon detector information, while at the HLT, a streamlined event reconstruction using the complete detector information is performed. A critical asset of the experiment is the rapid derivation of alignment and calibration constants for both the HLT and offline reconstruction. To achieve this, a dedicated set of triggers is integrated into the data-taking process. This contribution outlines the CMS alignment and calibration workflows and the interplay between these dedicated triggers and the derivation of calibrations.
Philipp Nattland (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: