The global energy transition to renewable energy sources requires a rigorous assessment of the environmental impacts of all system components, including power electronics converters (PECs), which play a critical role in adapting generated energy to grid and load requirements. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative assessment of conventional PECs used in renewable energy systems, with a focus on DC-AC, DC-DC, and AC-DC converters. The study combines life cycle assessment (LCA) with the Circular Energy Sustainability Index (CESI) to evaluate both environmental performance and material circularity. The LCA is conducted using a functional unit defined as a representative converter, within consistent system boundaries that encompass material extraction, manufacturing, and end-of-life stages. This approach enables comparability among converter topologies but introduces limitations related to the exclusion of application-specific design optimizations, such as maximum efficiency, spatial constraints, and thermal management. CESI is subsequently applied as a decision-support tool to rank converter technologies according to sustainability and circularity criteria. The results reveal substantial differences among converter types: the controlled rectifier exhibits the lowest environmental impact and the highest circularity score (95.3%), followed by the uncontrolled rectifier (69.3%), whereas the inverter shows the highest environmental burden and the lowest circularity performance (38.6%), primarily due to its higher structural complexity and the material and manufacturing intensity associated with its switching architecture.
Ovalle-Flores et al. (Fri,) studied this question.