Two possible methods of treating the atmospheric boundary layer in numerical models of the atmosphere are described, and their advantages and disadvantages discussed. It is assumed that the model is one which computes successive values of certain variables at grid points fixed in the horizontal and vertical. The first method calls for a modelling of the boundary layer above a level of, say, 20 m. In order to do this, the results of sub-grid scale mixing processes above 20 m must be modelled, and the uncertainties here are the weakest part of the procedure. The second method involves the parameterizing of the whole boundary layer, and is more economical in that it does not attempt to describe detailed structure. Its defects are that its accuracy is at the mercy of time and space variability, the proper taking account of which is as yet not possible; and that it is not valid in at least the inner tropics. Essentially both methods consist in interpolating on nomograms. The information contained in the nomograms has been distilled from the results of a number of Australian expeditions.
R. H. Clarke (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: