What type of study is this?

This is a Cross-Sectional Study study (also classified as: Human Clinical Trial, Validation Study).

What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to classify knee function using smartphone videos of single-leg squats to improve movement quality evaluation.

February 8, 2026Open Access

Smartphone-Based Interpretable Machine Learning for Classifying Single-Leg Squat Performance Using Trunk, Pelvic, and Knee Kinematics: A Cross-Sectional Study (Preprint)

Key Points

This research aims to classify knee function using smartphone videos of single-leg squats to improve movement quality evaluation.
Developed an interpretable ensemble learning framework for classification.
Labeled SLS videos into categories (Good, Moderate, Poor) with physiotherapist input.
Extracted kinematic features using 2D pose estimation and selected features with hybrid methods.
Trained six classifiers with stratified 5-fold cross-validation.
Employed SHAP and LIME for interpretability of model decisions.
Achieved 87.5% accuracy and F1-score of 87.6% on the test set.
AUC of 0.938 demonstrated high model performance.
Identified Trunk × Knee interaction as key feature in classifications.
Provided instance-level explanations for clearer decision-making.

Abstract

Background: Accurate and interpretable classification of knee function is essential for evaluating movement quality in clinical and sports contexts but remains challenging without expert assessment or laboratory-based motion capture. Objective: This study developed and validated an interpretable ensemble learning framework that classifies knee function into three levels (Good, Moderate, Poor) from single-smartphone, front-view single-leg squat (SLS) videos. Methods: A dataset of SLS videos was labeled by physiotherapists into three categories, and kinematic features were extracted from 2D pose estimation. Engineered features, including ratios, nonlinear terms, and interaction variables, were selected using a hybrid statistical and recursive elimination approach. Six classifiers were trained with stratified 5-fold cross-validation and a held-out test set, and a soft voting ensemble was developed to enhance robustness. SHAP and LIME were applied for global and local interpretability. Results: The soft voting ensemble combining Logistic Regression and LightGBM achieved high performance on the held-out test set (accuracy = 87.5%, F1-score = 87.6%, AUC = 0.938). SHAP analysis identified the Trunk × Knee interaction as the most influential feature for distinguishing poor classifications, while LIME provided instance-level explanations that clarified decision boundaries. Conclusions: Global and local interpretability enhanced model transparency by illustrating why impaired movement patterns were detected, thereby supporting personalized feedback on knee function. This interpretable framework provides a practical and accessible solution for functional knee assessment, with direct applicability to rehabilitation, athletic screening, and remote monitoring. Clinical Trial: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jeonju University

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6987eb5df6bacdd2fe8fca5d https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/85126

Bookmark

View Full Paper