The use of biosolids in agriculture enhances soil fertility and organic matter, yet concerns remain over the accumulation of contaminants of emerging concern in soils and food crops. Despite increased land application, long-term field-based evidence on the environmental fate and plant uptake of these compounds is limited. This study hypothesized that prolonged biosolid application improves soil carbon and nitrogen without promoting triclosan (TCS) or sulfamethoxazole (SMX) persistence or uptake under rainfed and rainfed + irrigation maize systems. Over a decade and half, a field trial was conducted with biosolids applied at rates of 0, 4, 8, and 16 t ha−1 yr−1. Soil samples were analyzed for organic carbon, total nitrogen, pH, electrical conductivity, TCS, and SMX. Maize stem, leaves, and grain were similarly analyzed for TCS and SMX. Results showed that biosolids significantly improved soil organic carbon and nitrogen (p ≤ 0.0001), but also increased soil acidification and salinity. SMX was not detected in either soil or plant tissues at any rate. Although TCS was absent in soils six months post-application, it was detected in maize shoots and grains at 8 and 16 t ha−1 yr−1, highest in stems (6.66–8.92 ng g−1) and lowest in grains (3.25–4.28 ng g−1). Estimated dietary intake was well below health risk thresholds. These findings support biosolid application ≤ 16 t ha−1 yr−1 as a safe and effective treatment for improving soil fertility in maize systems. Future research should explore transformation products, microplastics, and cumulative exposure under varied agroecosystems.
Tesfamariam et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: