In patients with intermediate stenosis undergoing PCI, FFR guidance was noninferior to IVUS guidance for the composite outcome at 24 months.
Does Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guidance reduce death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization compared to Intravascular Ultrasonography (IVUS) guidance in patients with intermediate stenosis evaluated for PCI?
In patients with intermediate stenosis evaluated for PCI, FFR guidance is noninferior to IVUS guidance for the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
In patients with intermediate stenosis who were being evaluated for PCI, FFR guidance was noninferior to IVUS guidance with respect to the composite primary outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; FLAVOUR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02673424.).
Koo et al. (Wed,) reported a other. In patients with intermediate stenosis undergoing PCI, FFR guidance was noninferior to IVUS guidance for the composite outcome at 24 months.