This paper argues that there is an important yet underexplored idea of existential trial, expressed by the notion of Anfægtelse, in Kierkegaard’s account of the human self. I argue that there are three kinds of existential trials, corresponding to the three major existential spheres: the esthetic, the ethical, and the Christian-religious. Each existential trial involves an essential conflict between two constitutive elements of the relevant sphere. They reveal the problem inherent to one’s relation to a certain “other” in all spheres, highlighting the Kierkegaardian idea that the human self is not self-grounding or self-sufficient. This points to the need for God’s grace in one’s self-development. Furthermore, I show that the religious Anfægtelse can mean two different but closely related things. It sometimes refers to a spiritual temptation that distracts one from engaging in an absolute God-relationship, and sometimes a spiritual trial to which the spiritual temptation pertains only as a part.
Lanxin Shi (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: