This short manuscript presents a three-part thought experiment arguing that “absolute nothing” cannot be a stable terminal description once structural closure and negation are admitted. It distinguishes epistemic certainty (a mental state) from structural certainty (a constraint), then uses that distinction to motivate a minimal three-state alphabet -1, 0, +1: ground (0), departure (+1), and inverse departure (-1).
Alan Ball (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: