What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to validate the Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) focused on situational conflict handling styles.

March 2, 2026Open Access

Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) for Situational Conflict Handling: Validation Notes and Materials.

Key Points

This research aims to validate the Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) focused on situational conflict handling styles.
Reviewed five-item Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) assessing various conflict styles.
Included validation notes and analysis outputs linked in separate PDFs.
Analyzed a sample of 2,396 individuals from Germany for empirical evidence.
Demonstrated strong correlational evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity of CHM.
Showed that the conflict handling styles can be reliably assessed with this measure.

Abstract

This Record is a living collection of validation notes and accompanying materials for the five-item Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) assessing situational conflict handling (avoiding, integrating, obliging, dominating, compromising). Each validation note is provided as a separate PDF with linked analysis outputs (tables) and a brief documentation. Included in Version 1: Validation Note 1 (Germany; N = 2,396): correlational evidence for convergent/discriminant validity. Citation: Cite the version-specific DOI for the exact evidence used. The concept DOI represents the continuously updated record across all versions.

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Engelhardt et al. (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52e75f1e85e5c73bf224d https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18814778

Bookmark

View Full Paper