Štekauer (2015: 47) claims that affixation is “by far the most common strategy employed in evaluative morphology”. Accordingly, the primary focus of evaluative morphology (Grandi a beautiful woman’ vs. een pracht van een vrouw ‘lit. a beauty of a woman; a beautiful woman’). The second case study will concentrate on adjectival evaluative compounds that express intensification through comparison, also called “similes” or “elative compounds” (Hoeksema 2012), as well as their phrasal counterparts (e.g., apetrots ‘lit. monkey-proud’ / zo trots als een pauw ‘lit. as proud as a peacock; very proud’). The differences and similarities between the evaluative compounds and their corresponding phrases will be determined through a detailed corpus analysis of their semantic and formal properties, as well as their productivity. The corpus data will be taken from the Dutch Web Corpus 2020 (nlTenTen20), available on SketchEngine (Kilgarriff et al. 2014). On a theoretical level, the case studies will allow us to address the question of whether the evaluative compounds and their corresponding phrasal patterns are complementary or in competition with each other. Our studies will show that some subpatterns form good alternates (e.g., een pracht-N vs. een pracht van een N), while others are used in quite divergent ways (een droom-N vs. een droom van een N). References Dressler, W. U., & Barbaresi, L. M. (1994). Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Grandi, N., & Körtvélyessy, L. (Eds.). (2015). The Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Hoeksema, J. (2012). Elative compounds in Dutch: Properties and developments. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Crosslinguistic comparison of intensified adjectives and adverbs (pp. 97-142). Hamburg: Kovač Verlag. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubiček, M., Kovař, M., Michelfeit, J., Rychly, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1, 7-36. Manova, S., Grestenberger, L., & Korecky-Kröll, K. (Eds.). (2023). Diminutives across languages, theoretical frameworks and linguistic domains. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Štekauer, P. (2015). Word-formation processes in evaluative morphology. In N. Grandi & L. Körtvélyessy (Eds.), Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology (pp. 43-60). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kristel Van Goethem
UCLouvain
Word-Formation Theories VII Typology and Universals in Word-Formation VI
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Goethem et al. (Wed,) studied this question.