ホーム
探索
nav.journalClub
トレンド
その他
synapse
⌘+K
言語
日本語
日本語
March 3, 2026
Scientific publishing, science integrity, and PubPeer
Thomas C. Südhof
Semmelweis University
Key Points
Peer review is crucial for maintaining science integrity in scientific publishing, ensuring trustworthiness.
This analysis identifies gaps in open-access models that may compromise research evaluation.
Observational analysis focused on common practices in scientific publishing and peer review processes.
These insights may enable better practices in research integrity and accountability, promoting more reliable findings.
Mark Helpful
Like
Save
Bookmark
Relay
Share
Cite This Study
Copy
Thomas C. Südhof (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76104c6e9836116a2e831
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2026.02.009
Mark Helpful
Like
Save
Bookmark
Relay
Share
Scientific publishing, science integrity, and PubPeer | Synapse