PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Site 100 - Geophysics Survey Report Heritage Non-intrusive Survey Reports Group 012

MBMatt BerryHeadland Archaeology (UK) Limited (United Kingdom)

Key Points

  • This survey aims to evaluate the archaeological potential of Site 100 through geophysical methods.
  • Used four Bartington Grad601 sensors mounted on a rigid frame
  • Performed readings at 10Hz frequency with 1m sample intervals
  • Linked to Trimble R8s dGPS for high positional accuracy
  • Data was stored on an external laptop for later processing
  • No anomalies of archaeological origin were identified
  • Only low magnitude and dipolar 'spike' anomalies of natural and modern origin observed
  • Magnetic disturbance noted along the southern boundary caused by fencing

Abstract

The survey was undertaken using four Bartington Grad601 sensors mounted at 1m intervals (1m traverse interval) onto a rigid carrying frame. The system was programmed to take readings at a frequency of 10Hz (allowing for a 10-15cm sample interval) on roaming traverses (swaths) 4m apart. These readings were stored on an external weatherproof laptop and later downloaded for processing and interpretation. The system was linked to a Trimble R8s Real Time Kinetic (RTK) differential Global Positioning System (dGPS) outputting in NMEA mode to ensure a high positional accuracy for each data point, in accordance with EAC guidelines (EAC 2016). The survey has not identified any anomalies of definite or possible archaeological origin. The only identifiable features in the magnetometer data are occasional sporadic low magnitude and dipolar 'spike' anomalies of natural and modern origin respectively and a strip of magnetic disturbance along the southern boundary of the parcel caused by fencing. The findings of the survey reflect the limited archaeological potential of the general area which is not recorded as within a RAZ and that was identified in the Historic Environment search conducted for the HS2 Environmental Statement and remote sensing survey data which did not identify any features within Site 100.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matt Berry (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cc8ed48f933b5eed8210https://doi.org/10.5284/1139623
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Site 094 - Geophysics Survey Report Heritage Non-intrusive Survey Reports Group 0122022
  2. 2Site 124 - Geophysics Survey Report Heritage Non-intrusive Survey Reports Group 0152022
  3. 3Site 295 - Geophysics Survey Report Heritage Non-intrusive Survey Reports Group 0192022
  4. 4Site 275 - Geophysics Survey Report Heritage Non-intrusive Survey Reports Group 0192022
  5. 5Site 210 - Geophysics Survey Report - Heritage Non-intrusive Survey Reports Group 0022022