The increasing surgical gap between timely and safe surgical access is a persistent global health emergency. Despite advances in surgical science and education, billions worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and remote rural communities, are deprived of access to specialist surgical expertise and simple surgical procedures. The fusion of telementoring and remote surgery, made possible by high-speed internet, robotic systems, and real-time imaging, provides a disruptive answer to bridge the surgical gap. These technologies not only connect specialist surgical expertise to the periphery but also enable training of local surgical teams in a scalable and sustainable fashion1. This manuscript upholds the ethical use and communication of AI-powered technologies in surgical caregiving routines by the TITAN 2025 Guidelines, focusing on AI reporting in healthcare systems2. Telementoring refers to remote expert mentoring of a junior surgeon in real-time, using audiovisual technology, screen sharing, telestration, and augmented reality overlays in some instances. The model has been promising in a number of fields, including laparoscopic surgery, trauma surgery, and orthopedics3. It improves intraoperative decision-making, encourages best practice, and decreases complication rates without the need for physical presence by the mentor. Notably, telementoring facilitates ongoing education and upskilling of local surgeons, decreasing professional isolation and building surgical self-sufficiency in the long run. A number of pilot programs in sub-Saharan Africa and rural Asia have confirmed the efficacy of telementoring in enhancing surgical performance and increasing access to complex procedures4. Remote surgery, or telesurgery, goes one step further by enabling a skilled surgeon to conduct a physical procedure on a remote patient through robotic means. Conceived first in the early part of two decades ago with the Lindbergh Operation, the viability of telesurgery has significantly improved with the availability of low-latency 5G communications networks, haptic feedback systems, and surgical robots. Remote surgery in current usage has the potential to provide high-quality, specialist treatment in regions that do not have resident specialists, particularly in cases of emergencies or in war zones where it is logistically difficult to deploy surgical teams5. The COVID-19 pandemic hastened the uptake of telemedicine, including its surgical variants. In-person interactions were minimized, and this movement highlighted the benefits of remote surgical collaborative models, especially as long-term measures. Nations that have advanced digital infrastructure have implemented remote surgical programs not just for patient treatment but also for resident training and promoting inter-institutional collaboration. With the democratization of telecommunication platforms and costs of digital surgical platforms coming down, it is now possible to imagine a global surgery ecosystem where remote intervention and mentorship are the order of the day, particularly in resource-limited environments6. While the potential exists, there are certain issues. Secure high-speed connectivity, cybersecurity, legal and ethical aspects, and the expense of robotic systems are significant impediments to widescale deployment. Cultural acceptability, data sovereignty, and medico-legal accountability in cross-border surgical practice also need thoughtful policy development and stakeholder discussion. Standardized protocols, credentialing, and quality assurance guidelines will be required to offer safety and efficacy. Health infrastructure investment, education, and technology collaboration will be required to realize the full potential of remote surgery and telementoring7. In addition, augmented and virtual reality roles in supporting telementoring are increasing. These technologies enable interactive learning, and remote mentors can mentor procedures more accurately. AI further enhances the systems by providing decision support, automating mundane tasks, and indicating complications in real-time. AI, AR, and remote connectivity collectively redefine perioperative assistance, creating a responsive and dynamic support system for frontline surgeons. Concurrently, wearable technology and intraoperative data analytics support patient safety, enabling mentors to track physiological parameters and surgery metrics remotely8. To achieve full utilization of remote surgical systems in regular practice, governments, hospitals, technologists, and medical schools must collaborate. Public–private partnerships can subsidize the costs and replicate technologies, especially in LMICs. Integration of telementoring in surgical residency programs can make routine use the new norm and reduce resistance among traditionally trained surgeons. International surgical societies must drive the creation of consensus guidelines and global networks of mentorship to enable continuous learning9. In conclusion, telementoring and remote surgery are not science fiction but future realities with the potential to revolutionize the delivery of surgery. Transcending geographical, economic, and resource limitations, these technologies ensure that no patient is denied lifesaving surgical care due to a lack of local expertise. With advancing surgical science, embracing digital technologies that provide greater reach and capability is not an option but an imperative. Universal access to surgery is part of universal health coverage, and remote surgical technology is at the center of making it a reality. International Journal of Surgery Open, with its vision to advance surgical science and education, is an ideal platform to promote and share evidence for these revolutionizing technologies.
S et al. (Tue,) studied this question.