This study evaluates the quality of ionosphere-corrected bending angle products from 12 satellite radio occultation (RO) missions, with data provided by the ROM SAF and CDAAC data centers. The missions include MetOp-B/C, Sentinel-6, Spire, COSMIC-2, KOMPSAT-5, and TerraSAR-X. The assessment focuses on bending angle quality control (QC), bias and noise characteristics at 65–80 km altitude, and statistical errors, with ERA5 data used as the reference. For quality control, Spire products achieved the highest pass rate, exceeding 99%. Products from the two MetOp satellites and Sentinel-6 exhibited pass rates above approximately 90%. The COSMIC-2 series had a pass rate of ~81%, while KOMPSAT-5 and TerraSAR-X had pass rates of 62% and 68%, respectively. Concerning bending angle biases, slightly larger biases were observed in MetOp setting events. Biases from other missions were mostly within the range of 0–0.05 μrad. Regarding noises, Sentinel-6 recorded the smallest bending angle noise (0.87 μrad), whereas TerraSAR-X (2.3 μrad) and KOMPSAT-5 (1.9 μrad) showed the largest noise magnitudes. Systematic differences in bending angles from all 12 RO missions were generally consistent below 60 km, while their standard deviations show good consistency below 35 km. In the middle stratosphere (35–50 km), MetOp-B/C and Sentinel-6 displayed the smallest standard deviations. Spire values are 1–2% larger, COSMIC-2 values 5–10% larger, and TerraSAR-X values the largest. Since ERA5 data also contain inherent uncertainties, particularly above 60 km, the findings of this study can only serve as a preliminary reference for users applying these datasets in weather and climate research. Future work will investigate the detailed causes of discrepancies among different datasets at high altitudes.
Ye et al. (Mon,) studied this question.