This paper introduces a layered systems framework that separates memory processing architecture from behavioral expression, maintaining an analytic distinction between cognitive mechanisms and moral or diagnostic labels. The framework posits memory processing as a middle-layer architecture within a three-tiered cognitive system, which is distinct from behavioral taxonomies applied at the output level. Four structurally distinct memory processing conditions (MPA-V, MPA-F, MPA-X1, MPA-X2) are defined independently of behavioral outcomes, while aggression is classified separately using a triadic model based on regulatory orientation. This separation prevents reductionism, avoids conflating mental health mechanisms with moral judgments, and enables precise classification of high-intensity behaviors without collapsing explanation into labeling. The framework supports interdisciplinary applications across clinical, forensic, and research contexts while maintaining explanatory precision.
Jonathan Adams (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: