ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to compare and contrast two approaches to drug usage control: decriminalisation and rigorous prohibition. This study compared the two policy approaches' potential effects on society, the economy, and public health by analysing secondary data from scholarly articles, official documents, and reports from throughout the world. Our research suggests that outright bans on drugs do nothing to curb use and could lead to more jail population, a thriving underground market, and public health crises. Reducing addiction rates, reducing overdose fatalities, and facilitating social reintegration are all outcomes of decriminalisation policies that prioritise harm reduction and rehabilitation, such as those enacted in Portugal. In sum, we contend that recasting drug misuse from a criminal offence to a public health and social concern may facilitate rehabilitation and peace in the community. In comparison to outright prohibition, decriminalization—when coupled with education and treatment—offers a more compassionate, efficient, and long-term solution to the problem of drug usage. Keywords: Strict Prohibition, Narcotic Drug Abuse, Drug Policy, Public Health, Policy Effectiveness.
Jain et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: